 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Introducing the eight award-winning works and 21 final pieces which
were selected in the main evaluation. |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
| |
The 34 prototypes selected in
the preliminary selection process were gathered in Asahikawa
for the main selection process on May 13 and 14.
We had Mr. Toshiyuki Kita (Japan), Mr. Motomi Kawakami
(Japan), Mr. Kunio Shibuya (Japan), Mr. Yrj
Wiherheimo (Finland), and Mr. Hans Sandgren Jakobsen (Denmark)
as our judges and selected eight award-winning works and
21 final pieces. |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Comments by the judges
|
Toshiyuki Kita (The head of the examination committee)
|
|
|
 |
The International Furniture Design Competition Asahikawa
2002, our fifth competition, received 820 entries from all
over the world. The triennial competition is now growing as
a highly evaluated competition because of its high quality
entries. This fact shows that it is very important for competitions
to be held continuously in order to receive superior designs.
The judging criteria of the competition were the marketability,
originality, quality, social needs, and advancement of local
industry. The full-scale mockups which were selected for the
main selection process were gathered in Asahikawa, and at
first 30 final pieces were chosen. Conclusively award-winning
works were selected from among those 30 final pieces.
The work "PIN COAT" won the Gold Leaf due to its
unconventionality of usage, originality and marketability.
The Silver Leaf was given to the work "Back to Soil Chair"
for winning approval for its simple construction and its well
throughout.
The works which implied the idea of the future proposal of
the worldwide wooden furniture ranked higher, and they also
indicated the future to Asahikawa, the producing district
taking an active part in domestic markets. In accordance with
all of the judges' wishes, six Bronze-Leaf winning works were
selected (originally planned for five) from among many excellent
final works. The bench which was made by the combination of
solid wood and plywood. The screen with a unique idea. The
chair which took advantage of the lumber's warmth and the
material. The digital clock which took shape of function and
fascinating aspect together by using the light looming through
fine sliced veneer. The shelf made of aluminum and plywood,
which was easily assembled. Finally the bench for three people
won the approval for the usage of material, stacking ability
and its joints.
The award-winning works in this competition were remarkable
for the originality, high quality, sense of beauty, and care
for the practical application. Moreover, I found many final
pieces which can be put in the market with small modifications.
I hope that the achievements of the competition will be a
valuable contribution to world furniture as well as the Asahikawa
furniture industry.
|
| |
|
 |
 |
Motomi Kawakami
|
|
|
 |
The fifth competition is reaching the most interesting part.
I could find some innovative entries of the 21st century through
this competition.
It was very difficult to select award-winning works since
the final pieces which cleared the first stage of the main
selection process were of a high level of quality and were
rich in variety in the field of furniture. After the heated
debate, we, as judges, obtained the organizing committee's
agreement to add one more Bronze Leaf Award.
We looked very much to the works possessing the idea of connection
to the future more than the works which are high quality but
similar to the designs in existence. Moreover, we became more
severe especially when we examined the chairs. Through the
long history of wooden chairs, it is extremely rare to find
chairs which catch our attention. We could not find any outstanding
works from such perspectives in this competition unfortunately.
The "Back to soil chair" which won the Silver Leaf,
however, was an absorbing piece for its attempt to indicate
the new way of producing although the work still needs further
research on amelioration.
In this competition, I saw more than a few works which, with
a little improvement, would be able to pass as commercial
products. I am now able to anticipate further progress, from
this competition and beyond. It seems like Asahikawa furniture
is in the process of being disseminated throughout the world.
|
| |
|
 |
Kunio Shibuya
|
| |
|
|
 |
I can see the furniture design of the 21st century through
the award-winning works of the competition. The common characteristics
of the award-winning works are the lightness, the organic
combination of the materials and the accessible image of lumber
which contrast with the inorganic, high-technology material
increasing recently. We identify with such things because
it holds to our image of the future living environment.
I think that the variety of life styles and the diversity
of life would be high-lighted in this century.
In the production-centered industrialized society of the 20th
century, the role of humans and the areas they inhabit seemed
almost established. However, people noticed that they needed
to keep a proper distance from production after experiencing
an unexpected change in social structure, international liquidation
of the producing district, price collapse, outsourcing and
restructuring. Eventually they became wise to the fact that
producing is a device, not a purpose. Especially after the
modern age began, human beings tried to build their little
castles without abandoning each habitat. As a result, their
surroundings became uncoordinated, and they started admitting
the importance of an ecological viewpoint and the vulnerability
of society. Compared to other animals which nest and move
freely through nature, contemporary humans are heavily burdened
by their possessions.
The designs of the Gold Leaf and Silver Leaf winning entries
were marvelously light and simple, allowing for greater freedom
and mobility, and the materials were used thoughtfully. Therefore,
the works proved to be suitable for nomadic life and its space.
Another characteristic of the award-winning and final pieces
of the competition was the well-expressed merit of wood. The
works took advantage of the wood's attribute by exquisite
combination with other materials such as metals.
I think Asahikawa, the host city of the IFDA, benefited in
may ways from this competition. I hope what we obtained through
the competition will have a good effect on the regional industry
and lifestyle, and I also hope that it will help in building
up the reputation of the "Asahikawa Brand" in the
21st century.
|
| |
|
|
 |
Yrj
WIHERHEIMO
|
|
|
 |
The quality of the prize-winning entries of the fifth International
Furniture Design Competition is excellent. There is a deep
understanding of the design complexity as well as personal
expressions of wooden furniture. The ambition to find also
new material applications parallel to the traditional ones
reflects awareness of the sustainable future.
For me personally it has been a great honor and pleasure to
be invited as a jury member.
The organization of the competition has been excellent so
that the judges have had the possibility to concentrate on
the essential core, the holistic design quality of the entries.
My best congratulations for the prize winners and many thanks
to all the competitors. Our hopes were realized through the
high quality of your designs.
|
| |
|
|
 |
Hans Sandgren JAKOBSEN
|
|
|
 |
It has been a great honor for me to join the jury of the
International Furniture Design Competition. It was a pleasant
surprise for me that the members of jury were so unanimous
in selecting the designs during the final phase.
The awarded furniture represent many continents, a lot of
types of furniture and international style. Therefore I really
hope that producers of furniture will be standing ready to
be allowed to produce the new furniture designs. Good luck.
|
| |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
The
preliminary selection process took place on February 13th and
14th. This year's contest included 820 entries from 46 countries/regions.
We had Mr. Toshiyuki Kita (Japan), Mr. Motomi Kawakami (Japan),
Mr. Kunio Shibuya (Japan), Mr. Yrj
Wiherheimo (Finland), and Mr. Hans Sandgren Jakobsen (Denmark)
as our judges and selected 34 entries for the main selection
process. The main selection process will be held in May with
the 34 actual works. We received the following comments from
judges after the preliminary selection process.
|
 |
|
|
 |
Toshiyuki Kita (The head of the examination committee)
|
|
|
 |
I'm very glad to see many nice designs from all over the
world.
After having a heated debate, we finally selected about 30
works from 820 entries. I am looking forward to seeing the
prototypes in May. We received many high-level works for the
fifth competition, and it was more than we expected. I recognized
that it is very important for the competitions to be held
continuously in order to receive superior designs. Nowadays
"Asahikawa" is widely known among woodworking manufacturers
not only in Japan but around the world. I believe that the
International Furniture Design Competition Asahikawa is gradually
becoming more conventional in the world with many high-level
entries. I would like to keep a close eye on this competition
and development ofAsahikawa wooden furniture as local industry.
|
| |
|
|
 |
Motomi Kawakami
|
 |
 |
 |
It was very hard to
select due to lots of nice designs, but we finally chose 34
works for the main selection process. I look forward to see
high-level works in May. |
| |
 |
|
|
|
 |
Kunio Shibuya
|
 |
 |
 |
I think many of the
works had fresh aesthetic sensibility, and it was difficult
to narrow the entries down to thirty. We selected works which
have strong characteristic and seem like they are high quality.
I am looking forward to see the actual works in May. |
| |
 |
|
|
|
 |
Yrj
WIHERHEIMO
|
 |
 |
 |
The judging system was
very well organized, and it was just perfect to go through all
the entries efficiently. I’m looking forward to the main selection
process in May to see the prototypes because photographic images
can be different from the actual works. I hope the prototypes
which have been selected for the main evaluation are superior
to their images. |
| |
 |
|
|
|
 |
Hans Sandgren JAKOBSEN
|
|
|
 |
This was my first job
as a judge, but I think everything went very smoothly. I was
satisfied with the system of the preliminary selection process,
and it was amazing that we could go through more than 800 entries
in short order. It was also nice that we could take time for
each entry. This time, the entries with pictures of full-scale
prototypes were mostly selected for the main selection process.
I think it was because we could see more details than images
of miniatures. I’m looking forward to see the prototypes in
May and actually touch them, feel them, smell them, and see
how they work in the space. |
| |
 |
|
|
|